This has a few buttons for features that aren't available in Mixbus and may not be available when the overlay is available. ![]() In this particular case the iCon device won because it has a much larger dedicated 'meter bridge' and a knob over every fader those features made it more desirable for the broadcast customers that wanted a hardware controller.įor those interested in a sneak-peek, here is the overlay that I sent to iCon for their printing and manufacturing. ![]() iCon has been similarly supportive and they're planning to publish a dedicated controller 'overlay' which is a nice bonus. Regarding Presonus, they have been very good to us: they provided full specs for the controller devices's "native" mode and I agree that their devices are a great value. I found a few bad reviews on Gearslutz but that is not uncommon, and the specific issues raised there should not affect us since we will be writing our own software for the devices. We have the ProX, the G2 and the 'platform' series devices here. Long-term, though, this collaboration could certainly lead to a control surface or other hardware prior to our collaboration we did a thorough review of the iCon devices and I'm convinced that they use very high quality parts and manufacturing in their more expensive products like the ProX. ![]() For those reasons we've adopted the ProX as our preferred solution for our Mixbus VBM "cloud based" broadcast and communications software. For example the ProX has a secondary "scribble strip" that lets you retain the channel names above the strips, even when you are showing eq knobs, and it also has a dedicated 'master' meter which most devices lack. I don't anticipate a dedicated Mixbus controller from iCon right now, but there is lots of room to customize and improve support of these devices, when we have the full support of the manufacturer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |